Do you support the troops   
but not the Republican Agenda?  

 

Home

Who Are We?

Cape Cod News

Commentary

Democrats

Republicans

Editorials

Editorial Shorts

Points to Ponder

Letters

Policy

Write Us

Published by Michael Bradley

Contact us: Publisher@bradleyreport.net Webmaster@bradleyreport.net

Copyright © 2002 

Michael Bradley

 

 Texas and the Threat From Within

 “Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant to step over the ocean and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth (our own excepted) in their military chest, with a Bonaparte for a commander, could not by force take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years. At what point, then, is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us! It cannot come from abroad. If destruction be our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time or die by suicide.”

                           Abraham Lincoln, 1838

  By Michael Bradley

            Nations are entities afforded life by the human beings that inhabit their borders, but it is through the laws, mores and societal structures of each national population that countries are imbued with personality. That is how, throughout history, it has been possible for the informed peoples of the world to make generalized judgments about what could be expected from other nation states.

            Of course, just as well known friends can sometimes, somehow have a dramatic change of personality and beliefs, so can nations.

            America, still a relatively young nation, has on its way to maturity made its full share of mistakes on the world stage, but like the wayward youth who blunders and stumbles yet is known for a good heart, the nation has been recognized for its deep and generous spirit. Until very recently, people in every corner of the globe had an innate understanding that there was one powerful nation where life could be improved by individual effort, and where newcomers were ultimately absorbed into the mainstream.

            It was never as easy as the hopes and dreams from afar made it out to be, and as it stumbled toward maturity America had to struggle against its own contradictions. In a Nineteenth Century civil war that history has shown was only eclipsed in bloodletting by war in the Twentieth Century, the nation obliterated slavery, its worst contradiction.

Yet ever since then the country has been beset with lingering, hydra-headed prejudices. Nonetheless, as the nation grew and progressed, its very experiences diluted the force of its prejudices, much like what occurs to individuals with good hearts and an ability to evaluate new information.

            The people of other nations saw and understood this process. They watched as America became mature, sometimes awkwardly, but always seeming to uphold the idea and the ideal of individuality, of allowing personal freedom of thought and action to its citizens, trusting that their efforts would collectively make the nation stronger. It is not hard to understand the appeal a nation with such beliefs and ideals would hold out to people in the thrall of poverty and repression.

            This is, was, and always has been the unique strength of America.

            But now, as the country has reached a vigorous maturity, albeit shaken by greedy folly, it is facing an internal conflict as deep and unpredictable as the worst individual, mid-life crisis. A substantial part of America is looking inward, questioning itself and its long-held values, but the internal debate is one sided. That is the terrifying element of the crisis. Other Americans – the remaining majority – have not joined the debate.

            Ironically, the ‘Silent Majority’ this time is not some hypothetical right-wing dream of hidden support within the nation’s body-politic, it is instead an actual detachment by the majority, a willingness to observe rather than engage an increasingly activist, vitriolic and growing minority that calls itself conservative. The ancient axiom that the silence of good people encourages the growth of evil seems clearly at work.

          Our nation is chosen by God and commissioned by history to be a model to the world.

         George Walker Bush, 2000

            This remark by G.W. Bush is at its heart a reflection of the concept of American ‘exceptionalism,’ which is in some ways an extension of an almost religious belief on the part of many Texans that their state is the most ‘exceptional’ in an exceptional nation. That belief evolves from the short period of time when Texas functioned as an independent republic, but today it meshes smoothly with a reactionary mid-life identity crisis, which has begun to appear to the world as though America’s core personality may be about to change.

            Such fears undoubtedly were exacerbated on Friday, May 21st, when the Texas State Board of Education announced that for the next decade, until 2020, the nearly five million students in the Lone Star state’s high schools will be taught that the Founding Fathers really didn’t intend the separation of church and state, that the slave trade was actually the Atlantic Triangular Trade, and that the “theory” of evolution and the concept of creationism are counterbalanced issues that each individual must choose between.

Other changes in the state’s history and social studies textbooks will be the elevation of Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederacy, to equal status with Abraham Lincoln, but could anyone reasonably have anticipated that Thomas Jefferson would be pushed to the back of American history books, perhaps off the pages entirely and left as a footnote if at all? Mr. Jefferson, a deist as were many of the founding fathers, including George Washington, often took the lead in espousing the need for a separation of church and state. He was fully supported, since the other founders knew well the danger of state supported religion. But now the religious zealots of the ‘Christian Right’ want to absent him from history’s stage in their desire to declare America a Christian nation.

            What these so-called ‘Christians’ seem to clearly desire, as they revise American history, is not the establishment of an inclusive, gentle national religion, but a fire and brimstone codification of a Cotton Mather absolutism. If the Texas revisionists and their allies across the nation should succeed, they are far more likely to infect the nation with the spirit of an Elmer Gantry than that of a puritan zealot, however much they might desire to burn their perceived enemies at the stake.

            That reality is illustrated by other changes the textbook revisionists have made relating to more recent American history. The Texas schoolbooks will now inform students that Joseph R. McCarthy was justified in the blacklisting and red baiting actions he took in the early 1950’s, the dark era that commonly bears his surname and which generally is understood to have been antithetical to a democracy. Students will be taught that because, after the collapse of Russia, documents indicated there were Russian spies in America, Sen. McCarthy should be exonerated and his fascistic approach forgiven.

            American history of the 1950’s and 1960’s will also be revised to diminish the importance of the civil rights and the anti-war movements. Martin Luther King will share space on the new pages with the Black Panthers, and the word capitalism will be replaced with the term ‘free enterprise system.’

            Moving forward to even more recent history, the 5 million revised textbooks will emphasize the presidency of Ronald Reagan as the herald of a positive, conservative revolution, and in the same vein the books will canonize such figures as Jerry Falwell, the radio and TV evangelist who founded the ‘Moral Majority’ crusade and who is credited with the ascension of the New Christian Right as a political force.

Along with former Pres. Reagan, the textbooks will make Phyllis Schlafly – the conservative political activist and columnist known for opposing feminism and the Equal Rights Amendment – a figure of historic significance, together with organizations such as the National Rifle Association and the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation.

Also elevated to historical significance is Newt Gingrich and his so-called ‘Contract With America,’ which brought about the GOP’s control of Congress in 1995. It was also Gingrich who introduced the GOP to the politics of vitriol and hate that continue today, but now Texan students and any other American students who are given the same textbooks will see him, Falwell, McCarthy and Phyllis Schlafly as heroes.

And that is the key problem. Historically Texas buys so many textbooks that publishers have been prone to making deals with other states to provide the same books, often at discounted rates. In today’s world of digital publishing, however, and in the face of increasing resistance from some states, the threat to democracy may not be a great as it would have been in the past, yet the danger of twisted, distorted history in the hands of millions of America’s young still cannot be underestimated.

            It is worth considering that the Texas State Board of Education’s revised textbooks will require that the U.S. government be referred to as a ‘constitutional republic’ rather than a ‘democratic republic.’         

           

America does not presume to know what is best for everyone."

                    Barack Obama, 2010

             Pres. Obama made that remark during a speech in Egypt where he was seeking to reassure people throughout the Middle East and all other parts of the world that the policies of G.W. Bush were over.

            But that remark, perhaps more than any other, has resulted in a river of hatred directed at Pres. Obama on the internet and in the conservative media world. At first it might seem hard to imagine why such a simple, common sense statement would cause such deep, emotional resentment among conservatives, but when its considered that Obama’s remark strikes at the heart of American exceptionalism, it is suddenly easier to comprehend, though all the more fearful.

America is “not only unique but superior,” declared textbook reviewer Bill Ames of Dallas. In written statements he further stated that Americans are “a chosen people, divinely ordained to lead the world to betterment.” He also suggests that the United States will not “rise and fall; Americans will escape ‘the laws of history’ which eventually cause the downfall of all great nations and empires.”

If there was ever a more emphatic statement of American exceptionalism, it is hard to imagine what it might be.

The 9-5 ultra-conservative vote of the Texas State Board of Education was of course a singular, dramatic victory for the Republican hard-right and its adherence to exceptionalism. That it is so over the top as to seem ridiculous to the majority of Americans is a potential problem.

            It can only be hoped that informed people in the other 49 states will make it clear to their educational authorities that using any form of the current Texas textbooks will be considered abhorrent and reason for a political firestorm.

            But perhaps even more importantly, Americans need to understand how the current vitriolic, hard-ball politics of mainstream Republicans are now being outdistanced by an even more rigid and doctrinaire conservative movement. The success of the Texas State Board of Education is, if anything, reflective of the same extreme politics that are so visible in the Tea Party movement. This reality has not escaped the attention of the nations and peoples of the world, even if the ‘Silent Majority’ of common sense, rationally motivated Americans remains content to silently watch what may seem like a political comedy or parody.

            America is indeed in a mid-life crisis, and it is high time for all of America’s citizens to pay attention and speak up. Today, in America’s media heavy society, those who grab the podium and shout get the coverage, while the media meekly waits to see who may offer a counterpoint. The world is waiting for the rest of America to be heard above the chest pounding din of the hard-right.

It is safe to say the nations of the world are also holding their collective breath, remembering the taste of a right-wing America that the Bush administration provided and hoping that the face of the nation that emerges from this inner struggle is not that of a selfish bully or right-wing brute, but instead that of an open, generous friend who is maturely confident in the traditional democratic values of the Founders.

            As Abraham Lincoln said 172 years ago, “as a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide."

It will be a death knell to deny the nation’s true history and forget that its strength has always come from openness and diversity, representing within its ranks people from every corner of the globe.

The majority of Americans need to speak up.

 

                                                -30-