The Bradley Report


  

Do you support the troops   
but not the Republican Agenda?  

 

Home

Who Are We?

Cape Cod News

Commentary

Democrats

Republicans

Editorials

Editorial Shorts

Points to Ponder

Letters

Policy

Write Us

Published by Michael Bradley

Contact us: Publisher@bradleyreport.net Webmaster@bradleyreport.net

Copyright © 2002 

Michael Bradley

 

How To Neutralize
"Signing Statements"

There has been a challenge to Presidential "signing statements," and it should be recalled now. Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.) introduced the Presidential Signing Statements Act of 2006 on July 26, 2006. That bill would: Instruct all state and federal courts to ignore presidential signing statements. ("No State or Federal court shall rely on or defer to a presidential signing statement as a source of authority.")

Specter’s bill would instruct the Supreme Court to allow the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives to file suit in order to determine the Constitutionality of signing statements. The bill was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which Specter formerly chaired, on the day it was introduced, and there it withered in the GOP Congress, even though it was put forward by a Republican senator.

As with all un-passed bills, its very existence expired with the end of the 109th United States Congress on 9 December 2006.

File it again, Democrats.

There has not been a direct case on "signing statements" before the Supreme Court. Get one to the high court now, before the members are all conservatives. Advisory groups have said they doubt the "signing statements" are truly lawful. But advisory boards make no laws. This needs to be made into understandable law quickly.

If the high court approves "signing statements," the legislature has to make new law – perhaps a change to the Constitution – to wrest this absolute power from the executive’s hands. If such ‘signing statements’ cannot be curbed any other way, that may well be the only means left to make America once again a nation ruled by law and not by one man, the president.

It really does not matter whether that president is Republican, Democratic or of some other political persuasion; if this is allowed to stand, the president becomes an individual with boundless power, he transcends all rules. Once he or she has that power, we are no longer the United States. That, Speaker Pelosi, is by far the most important mission the Congress faces. Democrats have accomplished nothing as long as "signing statements" reign supreme over the actions of the legislative branch.

Now, while the Democrats have a Senate majority of one vote, is the time to get this done. That single vote majority might be the only thing that saves America from sliding into dictatorship.

 

February, 2007