The Bradley Report


  

Do you support the troops   
but not the Republican Agenda?  

 

Home

Who Are We?

Cape Cod News

Commentary

Democrats

Republicans

Editorials

Editorial Shorts

Points to Ponder

Letters

Policy

Write Us

Published by Michael Bradley

Contact us: Publisher@bradleyreport.net Webmaster@bradleyreport.net

Copyright © 2002 

Michael Bradley

 

Mixing Church and State,
Obama’s Greatest Mistake

By William Finucane

This is a shocker.

Shortly after edging a victory over New York Senator Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama started to spell out his campaign platform planks.

What was the number-one item in Obama’s platform?

He wants to expand the plan that George W. Bush began to use churches to fight domestic ills like hunger, homelessness, health issues and the like.

            It is apparently Obama’s “moral center” of his administration, he named it the Council for Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships.

But this flies in the face of a republican democracy.

How?

Simple: It takes the responsibility for formulating public programs away from the government and shifts it to the churches.

Surely the government will make noises about its own part in pushing some $500 million per year, at the very start, into clergymen’s hands, all the while assuring Americans that this is not a melding of church and state. The way Mr. Obama paints this picture is that marrying public government and private churches is the only way to tackle the moral monsters of  hunger, sickness, homelessness and lack of jobs.

That is a remarkably short-sighted view from a man who purports to have mastered the long range concepts of American democracy.

A more proper way of viewing these long-standing American problems is to propose programs such as President Franklin Delano Roosevelt floated in the 1930s. These were not carefully shaped to begin addressing problems at hand; they were direct stabs at creating solutions. If they failed, Roosevelt would openly admit it and try something else.

What Roosevelt did was to call on all Americans to share a great leap toward national solutions.’

And, yes, he told the rich they would have to pay more.

Then, as now, two Americas existed: the opulent moneyed and the dirt poor.

What really needs to be balanced is national income.

Tax law has to be reformed before that happens. All else is show. If Obama really wants to attack America’s huge imbalance in wealth, he will have to aim right at those with the big pockets and take them on.

He has to take some of that money from the bloated and give it to those who truly need it. To succeed, he will need the needy and middle classes to stand with him. That is not a religious stand, it is plain good government. And since the bloated moneyed class has satiated its greed through every type of market manipulation and high stakes gambling with housing and other financial underpinnings of the nation during the Bush ‘Open House for Business’ years, this is not income redistribution; it is long overdue penalty’s upon those who have happily looted the nation at the expense of the majority of Americans.

Fact is, Obama hammered himself into the national psyche with a thunderous speech at the last Democratic presidential convention, speaking of many of these very issues, which average people know well but have been powerless to halt during the GOP domination of public life.

Just about everybody loves the cadenced, eloquent rhetoric of Mr. Obama, but now it’s time to see some actual, Democratic policies that will roll back the effects of the grasping Bush years.

Ringing church doorbells and giving them money so that they can manage programs for the most desperately needy raises all manner of new problems: America therefore gains a lot of new troubles without solving the old ones.

Well, maybe Obama has other reasons for this call to the churches. Perhaps he wanted to show himself a bit more right wing than he has seemed in the past; walking beside the churches might somehow make him look more like Bush and company. But why? Aside from the fact that such an effort is transparent to everyone, it reveals an unexpected shallowness. Everyone knows that Bush played off religion as a diversion while his minions were undermining the Constitution and looting the country. In eight years they have driven the nation into the ground while hiding behind religion.

Maybe Obama was hoping this call to churches would help counterbalance his troubled past with rabble rouser Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., who made Obama sound like some sort of fringe candidate; of course most people don’t believe Obama is that brand of contender, but trying to deflect right wing criticism and exaggerations by reaching out to all religions with an extension of Bush policies only makes him look like a fool.

Trying to be something of a ‘regular guy’ to churchgoing Americans isn’t even self-serving; it won’t win over the skeptical and it will turn away the hopeful.  

This has nothing to do with America’s gargantuan national woes; this has everything with getting elected. Obama is leaning right to capture wavering Republicans and Independents. But he has raised doubts among the Democrats, all the long-time Democrats and those that will be Democrats this year, after watching the GOP ruin the nation.

America wants a Democrat in the White House, not a veiled Republican. Its leader has to show bold moves.

Republicans have practically dismantled Roosevelt’s programs and a hard hitting Democrat needs to fight for them again. It is vital that Mr. Obama remember that it was the Republicans who were in office during the decade – the 1920’s – that led to the Great Depression!

 

July, 2008